Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:10:42 +0100 From: Chris Howells <lists@chrishowells.co.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Geom Vinum backwards compatible? Message-ID: <200410121910.55918.lists@chrishowells.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200410121602.i9CG2kOr082691@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <200410121602.i9CG2kOr082691@hugo10.ka.punkt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1619486.rcGnviNa8r Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 12 October 2004 17:02, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Just did it on one machine and, yes, it worked. > That's not a statistically relevant base, though - YMMV ;-) Worked for me too when upgrading a machine from 4.10 to 5.3-beta7. The only= =20 issue that I possibly saw was that I had to improperly shut down the machin= e=20 and when it came back up again, since they are ufs1 parititions, fsck didn'= t=20 want to run on them (fsck_ufs worked though), and the kernel decided to pan= ic=20 because of this... (had to reboot in single user and remove the devices fro= m=20 fstab) I don't particularly want to improperly shut down the machine again= =20 and possibly corrupt my RAID in order to reproduce this though :) =2D-=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org --nextPart1619486.rcGnviNa8r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBbB4vF8Iu1zN5WiwRAtDfAJwJWBIvz5VmS8Kr9XiXefO9dOypgwCdF+vc 8mRJ+6C6zXdXYtXkFy4SULw= =IaY9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1619486.rcGnviNa8r--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410121910.55918.lists>