Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:07:59 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Message-ID: <9285bbff-90f2-f580-a2a1-7562277941ae@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru> References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> <7d0525ee-980e-a63a-f90f-974a7e1022cf@columbus.rr.com> <9ffa861978cdb1a06a69d7b9af525ad5@ultimatedns.net> <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please use poudriere or some other tool instead, there are some that were designed for clean-room rebuilds, which portmaster was *not* designed to do, and should not be turned into.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9285bbff-90f2-f580-a2a1-7562277941ae>