From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr 25 11:30:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA03199
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from X2296 (ppp1668.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.249.132])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03190
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by X2296 (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA03324; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 14:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 14:28:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@X2296>
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org, kgor@inetspace.com
Subject: Re: What is the absolute minimum options for a kernel? (INET required)
In-Reply-To: <199704251727.DAA05566@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970425142800.2478A-100000@X2296>
X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2
X-Mailer: Pine
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 26 Apr 1997, Bruce Evans wrote:

> >file that I created.  Why is INET a required option?
> 
> Because most people need it.

I recall someone tried to take it out, before, and they had
problems (nonspecific, but multitudous).


--
tIM...HOEk
Whoever told you I had a .signature was lying.