Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:00:52 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community Message-ID: <20080110110052.GB10155@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <4785E8A0.30806@gmail.com> References: <88854.1199953554@critter.freebsd.dk> <4785D9CB.5080909@gmail.com> <4785E8A0.30806@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Aryeh M. Friedman, who wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:42:56AM -0500 .. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <478556AD.6090400@bsdforen.de>, Dominic Fandrey > >> writes: > > > >>> The first problem is [...] > >> No. > > > >> The first problem FreeBSD has, is that the users do not > >> financially support enough full-time developers. > > > > There are some possible solutions to the lack of funding without > > having to ask corps for huge donations (they would actually improve > > the amount of contributed work also in all likellyhood.... see my > > blog > > http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php) > > > Forgot to mention that the approach outline is fairly compatible with > the BSD style of doing stuff (one of the other people involved with > the effort is actually drafting a BSD style license that is 100% > compatible with the current one (Free)BSD license)... see We need more licenses like we need a 3rd or 4th leg. What is wrong with the standard BSD license please? Wilko -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080110110052.GB10155>