Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 13:35:31 +1000 From: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS ftruncate patch for review Message-ID: <20030719033531.GA79812@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20030718173517.D22235@gamplex.bde.org> References: <20030718064120.GA72366@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030718173517.D22235@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:38:12PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > Any comments on this patch? The referenced PR contains more comments and a > > test program. It's not obvious from the diff, but the changes are to > > nfs_setattr() in the va_size != VNOVAL && v_type == VREG case. > > Good work. I've thought that the PR (41792) was quite serious since it > was submitted. > > BTW, what stopped PRs being mailed to the "normal" lists? freebsd-bugs is > normal I think. The PRs are still getting mailed to freebsd-bugs. The reason you didn't see my patch when I replied to the PR is because Kris assigned the PR to me. The reason followups go to the freebsd-bugs list is because, by default, the Responsible: field in the PR is set to freebsd-bugs. It would be better if Gnats would always Cc the bugs list. Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030719033531.GA79812>