From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 01:17:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0FF1065693 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.r.vansickle@att.net) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4536B8FC19 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.r.vansickle@att.net) Received: from dfw5rb41 (h-68-165-184-133.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net[68.165.184.133]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2009011701171111100h4mdee>; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:17:11 +0000 From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: , References: Your message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:32:30 EST." <23243.1232140762@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:17:10 -0600 Message-ID: <550B7A950EEE45359972D2A54F44EA5C@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <23243.1232140762@critter.freebsd.dk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Thread-Index: Acl4IBrCGd4A58KZSNORE2N34Yq2KwAIFvMg X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:31:07 +0000 Cc: Subject: RE: [Lcdproc] LCDProc CVS + PicoLCD on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:17:12 -0000 > From: Poul-Henning Kamp > > In message > , > Andre Gu ibert de Bruet writes: > >On Jan 16, 2009, at 5:09 AM, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >>> Unfortunately the PicoLCD 2X20 and 4X20 devices present > themselves > >>> as HID devices. > >> > >> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? > > It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because > that is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. > > The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID > specification. Ah. That's not "unfortunate", that's just sheer laziness on iTuner's part. Great, and I just bought one too. Welp, here's hoping whatever nonstandard protocol they do use works reasonably, and that the mfg gets their act together on the next one. -- Gary R. Van Sickle