From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 29 07:24:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AFADC8 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204A8FC14 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48575 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2012 08:55:19 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Nov 2012 08:55:19 -0000 Message-ID: <50B70D81.5090000@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:23:45 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vijay Singh Subject: Re: svn commit: r243627 - head/sys/kern References: <201211272004.qARK4qS8047209@svn.freebsd.org> <50B54180.5020608@freebsd.org> <50B54492.5040100@freebsd.org> <956CE44A-BA0F-4FE4-AA38-F4B90C85ECBA@FreeBSD.org> <50B54CE0.6080008@freebsd.org> <2A12C740-1D72-4D30-B663-47A37AAC2FF3@FreeBSD.org> <50B5C4F1.1020002@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" , Peter Wemm X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:24:00 -0000 On 29.11.2012 01:35, Vijay Singh wrote: >> a sign of poor prior testing and too much trust into the submitter of >> the patch it wasn't an earth shattering event. Doesn't distract from > > Andre, I am really quite disappointed to read this from you. The patch > I sent you was fine, and has been well tested here. You modified it > and made the error. If you wish, I can attach the mail I sent with the > patch. Vijay, Your original patch indeed was correct wrt. testing against the head pointer. On Nov. 2 I sent you my (wrongly) modified patch for review and testing. On Nov. 5 you replied that is looks good to you. There is no doubt that I screwed up about everything else on this patch but I did send it for review and you didn't catch the mistake I made. -- Andre