From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 25 09:16:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA13655 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 09:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13588; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id LAA18681; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 11:15:33 -0500 (EST) From: John Dyson Message-Id: <199609251615.LAA18681@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: pgcc port To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 11:15:33 -0500 (EST) Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, dyson@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Andreas Klemm" at Sep 25, 96 05:37:39 pm Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > I believe John Dyson has been using P5-optimized gcc for quite a > > while.... > > John, what do you think about integration some or all Pentium > related patches into our main cc 2.7.2.1 ?! > The pgcc is experimental at best. Once in a while, I can build a kernel that works. I really should give the pgcc guys some feedback, but my job and FreeBSD take up ALL of my time... I would keep our standard cc as stable as it can be -- if someone wants to run pgcc, let them do it at their own risk by installing the port. Pgcc sig-11's quite often. I have seen a few cases of incorrect code. Frankly, I think that it is in the state of being a superub experiment (I kind-of like it, the pgcc people are doing what the GCC people should have been doing), but I would not trust the family jewels to it quite yet :-). John