From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 11 7:33:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dart.sr.se (dart.sr.se [134.25.0.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5337D37B400 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from honken.sr.se (honken.sr.se [134.25.128.27]) by dart.sr.se (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0BFX3x34036; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:33:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@pluto.sr.se) Received: from pluto.sr.se (pluto.SR.SE [134.25.193.91]) by honken.sr.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA64412; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:33:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@pluto.sr.se) Received: (from root@localhost) by pluto.sr.se (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g0BFX2G84678; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:33:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar) Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by pluto.sr.se (8.11.6/8.11.1av) id g0BFX0x84666; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:33:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:32:59 +0100 From: Gunnar Flygt To: FreeBSD Stable Cc: Thomas Gravgaard Subject: Re: RE: cvsup-16-f issue Message-ID: <20020111163259.B84365@sr.se> Reply-To: Gunnar Flygt Mail-Followup-To: Gunnar Flygt , FreeBSD Stable , Thomas Gravgaard References: <1137F4C2EFF6D111B2330060B03C89D601C8E9D7@REDSRV> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1137F4C2EFF6D111B2330060B03C89D601C8E9D7@REDSRV>; from fehaar@infopaq.dk on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:44PM +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote: > > I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a > > cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will > > run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version > > won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly > > reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't > > have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO. > > IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in the Makefile because the default behaviour would run on systems with an without X11. Since I only run boxes without X11 it would > conveniently make my life easier too.... But thats another story :) And to add to that, if I install a new system, the first thing I would like to do on it, is to run cvsup on both /usr/src and /usr/ports before I install anything more (include X). > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Thomas Gravgaard | "The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) | > | Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) | > | Infopaq ApS | Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple \/ \ ^| > | fehaar@infopaq.dk | competition." Black Adder .\._/_)| > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | FC København. Danske mestre 2000/2001! | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \<,_ email: flygt@sr.se ---- (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message