From owner-freebsd-www Mon Feb 3 06:14:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA00109 for www-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 06:14:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from waldorf.appli.se (waldorf.appli.se [194.198.196.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA00100 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 06:14:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from nettan.appli.se (root@nettan.appli.se [194.198.196.5]) by waldorf.appli.se (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA27111; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 15:13:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (niklas@localhost) by nettan.appli.se (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA12101; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 15:13:28 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: nettan.appli.se: niklas owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 15:13:24 +0100 (MET) From: Niklas Hallqvist To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Niklas Hallqvist , www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filtering? In-Reply-To: <25086.854978130@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > reject route or whatever you use) and especially, no security gain. It > > would be the end for a serious security-focused OS like OpenBSD to host > > cracker attacks against any other organization. So such an argument falls > > But it does, and that's exactly the problem. I take it you have evidence for this as it is a rather serious argument. If you have so then I think you should let us know of the facts as it is the only way we can resolve a very serious problem at our end. I'd certainly tell you if I knew someone used your machines as a host for attacks. I'd do that even if I had differences with you (which I don't), because that's part of the survival instinct of our net. We're all in this together, you know. Niklas