From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 23 20:37:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB561065676 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marina@surferz.net) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net (eastrmmtao102.cox.net [68.230.240.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423A48FC1F for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20091223202518.XDJD1916.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:25:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([68.100.144.76]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id LkRG1d00G1f6uEU02kRH20; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:25:17 -0500 X-VR-Score: -150.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=463f1N2YpqHLOamhbp4wF7Njg/30QkdnTZ27hYvsP6Y= c=1 sm=1 a=7k7CYPn1HmdQxeF9j2IGlw==:17 a=4UFpGajtAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=GdD97LhIBGp16koJnbYA:9 a=fJCf3hjlxyTNHHPXBi0A:7 a=T0-ozn-gcPZ_qRemhjypQ-iHeYYA:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=7k7CYPn1HmdQxeF9j2IGlw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4B327CAB.9000203@surferz.net> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:25:15 -0500 From: Marina Brown Organization: Mtribe User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org References: <541b7a870912150733m4bc34148j98790a6142d4521c@mail.gmail.com> <20091223032410.GA25393@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20091223032410.GA25393@comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: why BSDs got no love X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:37:24 -0000 Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 15 Dec 2009 at 07:33:49 PST Jan Husar wrote: >> http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1123&tag=nl.e011 > > Others have pointed out that PC-BSD meets the need expressed in this > article. > > As for FreeBSD itself, the question must be asked: do we WANT to get > more love from people who judge an OS by whether or not it has a > graphical installer? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I preferr a non-graphical installer. I like the installers of the BSD's. The simpler the better ! --- Marina Brown