From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 20 21:16:03 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298A916A41F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:16:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E766743D49
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:16:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id A91774076; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:16:01 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:16:01 -0600
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Message-ID: <20060120211601.GA22276@soaustin.net>
References: <200601131825.SAA21164@sopwith.solgatos.com>
	<87r772obn8.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87r772obn8.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com, bug-bison@gnu.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portability fix for bison-1.75
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:16:03 -0000

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:03:07PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bison 1.75 is pretty old and has several known bugs.  I'm not sure I'd
> recommend it for widespread use these days.

Yes, but we still have 160 ports that depend on it.

mcl