From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 18:00:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4859A16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7087543FE0 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:00:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61659654E8; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:33:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 59312-02; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:33:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (unknown [82.147.19.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A71965436; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:33:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 75DF41F; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:33:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:33:42 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Taku YAMAMOTO Message-ID: <20031202063342.GA65529@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <20031202115630.717587dd.taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202115630.717587dd.taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes of tcp_hostcache.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:00:16 -0000 On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote: > The fix is attached as a patch against tcp_hostcache.c as of revision 1.2. Looks good to me. I haven't been able to test this thoroughly, netperf/netserver don't seem to want to listen on a TCP6 port for the TCPIPV6_STREAM test. Our port appears to incorporate the necessary patches. BMS