From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 11 14:42:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA29941 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 14:42:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail001.mediacity.com (mail001.mediacity.com [205.216.172.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA29686 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 14:41:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nicole@mediacity.com) Received: (qmail 29454 invoked from network); 11 Mar 1998 22:37:23 -0000 Received: from geekgirl.mediacity.com (HELO geekgirl) (208.138.36.25) by mail001.mediacity.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 1998 22:37:23 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 14:41:26 -0800 From: Nicole Harrington Subject: Re: 2.2.6-BETA OOP-ACK-BLEH sendmail 8.8.8 won't compile To: Doug White , Studded Cc: Nicole Harrington , The experts X-Mailer: Z-Mail Pro 6.2 (Win32 - 021297) Evaluation Copy, NetManage Inc.[ZM62_16E] X-Face: Dy;P!H@)Go.{^Epw&,}@q4ReQ3iOqFrASM63QjFsK/'XnOO67}+{szQ|oo]]`]/.r,g5lx; w+F^YYL4j <350704E9.E2ACBD66@dal.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Doug White wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Nicole Harrington wrote: > > > > Thankfully it was on my own server. I have recompiled most everything I > > > needed to after doing make world and building a new kernel. (Like named > > > 8.8.1 - Which *should* IMHO be in 2.2.6) > > > > Principle of least suprise says that named 8.x won't be in 2.2.x due to > > the config file renovation. Good candidate for 3.x though. > > Not just POLA, but the fact that the resolver and other > libraries/headers/etc. in BIND 8.1.1 are not yet ready for prime time. > Word is that 8.1.2 will have some or all of this stuff fixed, but the CW > for BIND is still build 4.9.6 to get the headers and libs (which we do) > and if you are running a publicly accessible nameserver build 8.1.1 to > get the better binaries and named.conf options. There's no way that BIND > 8.x should ever go into FreeBSD 2.anything, except as a port, which we > already have. :) OTOH, once it's ready for prime time BIND 8 should > definitely be part of -Current, hopefully before 3.0-Release. That will > be good timing for the change. > > Doug > Hmm I know that we have been using 8.1.1 for awhile now for primary and secondary NS for a very large number of domains and it does very well. It does have a small learning curve though. Nicole ******* |\ __ /| (`\ ******* * * | o_o |__ ) ) * * * * // \\ * * * Nicole Harrington | Systems Administrator * ----------------------(((---(((-------------------------- nicole@mediacity.com - nicole@ispchannel.com www.mediacity.com - www.ispchannel.com Phone: 650-237-1464 - Pager: 415-301-2482 Powered By Coca-Cola and FreeBSD Why do doctors call what they do practice? Microsoft: What bug would you like today? ---------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message