From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 11 16:47:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA26400 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:47:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.scsn.net (scsn.net [206.25.246.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA26327 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 16:46:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmaddox@scsn.net) Received: from rhiannon.scsn.net ([209.12.57.50]) by mail.scsn.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-41950U6000L1100S0) with ESMTP id AAA67; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:44:50 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by rhiannon.scsn.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id TAA00394; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:45:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from root) Message-ID: <19980111194553.03029@scsn.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:45:53 -0500 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: "John S. Dyson" Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, jak@cetlink.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) Reply-To: dmaddox@scsn.net References: <19980111193227.04735@scsn.net> <199801120039.TAA00461@dyson.iquest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199801120039.TAA00461@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:39:07PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:39:07PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > Charlie Root said: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:07:35PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > > John Kelly said: > > > > On Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:06:19 -0500, dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. > > > > Maddox) wrote: > > > > > > > > > I recently bought a 16C650-based LavaPort ISA card to support the > > > > >230,400 bps capability of my ISDN modem. It works fine under W95, but > > > > >does _not_ work fine under FBSD-current. > > > > > > > > The 650 support seems to be broken, so don't flag it as a 650. Run it > > > > as a 550 and it should work fine. You still get the benefit of the > > > > deeper FIFO, even when it's defined as a 550. You don't get the auto > > > > CTS/RTS flow control, but that has questionable value anyway. > > > > > > > I have a 16650 based card, and it appears to work well. It would be interesting > > > to figure out why mine works, and others don't. > > > > What kind of card do you have? I assume it's not a LavaPort... > > > SIIG CyberPro I/O. It has a full complement of IRQ and I/O port jumpers, > and also a baud rate scaling jumper set, which allows running at *2 and *4 > baud rates. Figures. I came _that close_ >< to buying the CyberPro... This card does not have jumpers for the clock... seems to be fixed at 4x. I think maybe that's the source of my problem.