From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 30 3:29:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from titan.metropolitan.at (mail.metropolitan.at [195.212.98.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33A214D9A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:29:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mladavac@metropolitan.at) Received: by TITAN with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) id ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C11002761796BD@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at> From: Ladavac Marino To: 'Jesus Monroy' , John Purser , advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [Re: [Linux vs. NT, take 2.]] Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:26:36 +0200 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesus Monroy [SMTP:jesus.monroy@usa.net] > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 11:40 AM > To: John Purser; advocacy@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: [Re: [Linux vs. NT, take 2.]] > > "John Purser" wrote: > > If we're going to look at their relative performances as ratios then > > lets > > look at the ratio of their costs! Anybody know the current cost of > NT > > with > > unlimited user licenses? > > > This point is waste of time. Please save it for the LINUX kids. > I for one consider this comment kindeling material. [ML] The sky must be falling--I'm in agreement with Jesus concerning this comparison. /Marino > --- > "I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped, > pop-up-happy dungeon like NT." > http://www.performancecomputing.com/features/9809of1.shtml > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Get free e-mail and a permanent address at > http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message