From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 20:06:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C819C16A41F for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:06:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A2843D49 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005072220061701100kloi1e>; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:06:18 +0000 Message-ID: <42E151B4.7030500@bfoz.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:06:12 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SMP support maturity? AMD64x2 or FX-57? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:06:28 -0000 SMP support in FreeBSD seems to be a perpetually favorite feature to gripe about, but every release seems to say that its getting better. I'm about to build a new server and am trying to determine if I should go with dual procs or just a single. The AMD64x2 is slightly cheaper than the FX-57 so I'm leaning that way, but it would be a rather pointless savings if SMP isn't well supported. So, is SMP in -STABLE ready for primetime? Can it really make use of two processors?