From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:24:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE32E1065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66BA8FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOxQY-0003VF-7B; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:24:31 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KOxQX-0003vy-FT; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:24:25 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71GOOrD094190; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:24:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m71GON0g094189; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:24:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:24:23 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: macgyver Message-ID: <20080801162422.GA73400@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20080801110614.GA17503@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> <1217607190.8664.9.camel@executor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1217607190.8664.9.camel@executor> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: future for FBSD on alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:24:33 -0000 On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:13:10PM +0100, macgyver wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:06 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:34:25AM -0000, Angus MacGyver wrote: > > Me for example ran one as a webserver with no graphics card - just > serial line access (the jails were each DNS/IRC/Mail/Http for isolation) > > > I also ran another virtually identical (+gfx card) machine as a desktop > (tell you what - I *knew* when I had that thing turned on - I didn't > need to have the heating on upstairs!!!) > > Completely different uses will radically alter what ports are required. sure, and different energy concerns. I've several ds10l in an air-con server room far away. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423