From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 16 21:09:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4333106568D; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCC88FC18; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o1GL9J6k056926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:09:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by mail.cicely.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1GL9GS1049226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:09:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1GL9GQH073307; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:09:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id o1GL9GWf073306; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:09:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:09:16 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20100216210916.GN43625@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <20100215213907.GA43625@cicely7.cicely.de> <20100216183951.GI43625@cicely7.cicely.de> <20100216123646.fc741643.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20100216.135430.702773873773944731.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100216.135430.702773873773944731.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on spamd.cicely.de Cc: stas@FreeBSD.org, arm@FreeBSD.org, ticso@cicely7.cicely.de, ticso@cicely.de, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bind fails with sig11 on start / pthread failure on ARM? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:09:23 -0000 On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:54:30PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20100216123646.fc741643.stas@FreeBSD.org> > Stanislav Sedov writes: > : On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:51 +0100 > : Bernd Walter mentioned: > : > : > > : > Do we have a general threading problem on ARM? > : > > : > : I don't think so. I used a lot of threaded applications on arm, and they > : worked fine. However, this might be some obscure bug. > > I know that 6.x ARM worked with threads no problem. We had dozens of > threads in our control programs. No doubt - I'm running 7.0-current: [82]arm9# uname -a FreeBSD arm9.cicely.de 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #12: Thu Dec 6 02:39:25 CET 2007 ticso@arm9.cicely.de:/data/builder/arm-p4-running-2/src/sys/arm/compile/FBOX arm [83]arm9# uptime 10:02PM up 690 days, 19:43, 1 user, load averages: 0.29, 0.22, 0.15 Including named, although not on exactly this machine. This one is even compiled O2 - with a few hand selected exceptions. Compiling perl fails with sig11 as well, but I hadn't verified this problem any further. > The one caveat is that I've found bugs in the atomic routines in the > past, and have had people submit fixes as well. All of those should > be in the tree, but since some arrived when I was crazy busy for > Cisco, they might have fallen on the floor. I'm running on RM9200, so it is a UP system. Of course this won't rule out all possible atomic cases. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.