Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:56:27 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, John Hein <jhein@timing.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: Final sanity pass: xdev Message-ID: <20090329065627.GA4994@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <49CEC2C0.3020902@telenix.org> References: <18875.60334.947446.966085@gromit.timing.com> <20090315.080814.669286040.imp@bsdimp.com> <18877.57878.136116.691250@gromit.timing.com> <20090318.183646.-593221015.imp@bsdimp.com> <18881.38984.133668.539997@gromit.timing.com> <49C19F2A.10406@elischer.org> <18881.42546.640583.971867@gromit.timing.com> <49CEC2C0.3020902@telenix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:37:20PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I was going to ask in ports about this, but you folks really sound like you know > the llvm tool a whole lot better, and if, in answering my question, you > happened to answer things like benchmark results and if it makes good kernels, > well, you wouldn't hear me complaining. > > Anyhow, my question regards the llvm-devel port. The install phase wants to > build python26. Is that because the author of the port likes python26, or would > it really work if I used my presently available python25? I could fix my > makefile, if it'd work ok, but I need to understand why our llvm port needs > python26, before I shoot myself in the foot. the llvm/clang ships with a compiler driver that is written in python, the driver is being replaced by a C++ one. the C++ one currently works "just fine". expect the python dependency to be removed in a near future roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090329065627.GA4994>