From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 16:14:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A121AF for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC76284E for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56AA3CBF9; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s7HGEg5i003047; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:14:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:14:42 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Jamie Griffin Subject: Re: Flash plugin ? Message-Id: <20140817181442.8dc862dd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <53F0D244.5060807@gmail.com> References: <53F0986B.2000604@hiwaay.net> <20140817135824.78df3203.freebsd@edvax.de> <53F0D244.5060807@gmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:14:46 -0000 On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:03:16 +0100, Jamie Griffin wrote: > linux-f10-flashplugin is currently unavailable as one of its dependent > package is marked as forbidden, i've not been able to get around it with > the usual tricks so i've installed it against the c6-linux emulation > package instead of the f10 one Really? Uh, that's bad... Some time ago, I read that due to licensing, there are Linux ports that you can compile from source, but there won't be precompiled packages (as sources for pkg) for them. Wouldn't it be possible to determine which dependency is marked as forbidden, build that from source (and I assume obtaining the source for a "make install" run is _not_ forbidden) and continue from that point, either with ports or with binary packages? When I installed my system, I built all stuff from source, so the mentioned obstacle might not have hit me for that reason - or the obstacle is new. It's not that I install or update my home system every day... or week... or moth... or year... "never touch a running system"... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...