From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  3 16:29:27 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F19106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  3 Sep 2012 16:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net
	(asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819B98FC12
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  3 Sep 2012 16:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.53])
	by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	94AE3A710E6 for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  3 Sep 2012 12:29:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 21813 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2012 16:29:19 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 27309, pid: 26319, t: 0.1543s
	scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495
Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; 3 Sep 2012 16:29:19 -0000
Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8])
	by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1322F33C23;
	Mon,  3 Sep 2012 12:29:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 1825C3983C; Mon,  3 Sep 2012 12:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com>
References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:29:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1> (Darrel's message of
	"Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:08:25 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: matthew@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [solved]:  to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:29:27 -0000

Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> writes:

> Thanks, Matthew- and especially for mentioning to use -F on the first
> subsequent run of mergemaster.
>
>>
>>  svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src
>>
>
> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this:
> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports
>
> or can the most recent ports be run with a release, like this:
> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports
>
> Someone off of the list recommended something like this:
>
> svn co svn://svn.penx.com/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
> svn co svn://svn.penx.com/ports/head /usr/ports

I would expect ports to still be best with head, as I haven't heard
anything about branching it.

I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as
opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used
with subversion.