From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Sep 7 20: 9:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from dnvrpop3.dnvr.uswest.net (dnvrpop3.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.128.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BD9714D8A for ; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 20:09:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sitongia@uswest.net) Received: (qmail 27566 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 1999 03:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org@fixme Received: (qmail 27551 invoked by uid 0); 8 Sep 1999 03:08:03 -0000 Received: from hdialup175.dnvr.uswest.net (HELO ?204.107.134.7?) (207.225.106.175) by dnvrpop3.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 8 Sep 1999 03:08:03 -0000 X-Sender: sitongia@pop.dnvr.uswest.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 21:09:25 -0600 To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org From: Leonard Sitongia Subject: Flame or FAQ: PAO in kernel tree? Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org OK, so I'm prepared to be flamed, because I'm not sure if this is stepping on toes... It's not in the FAQ... Why isn't the PAO stuff in the standard distribution tree for FreeBSD? In other words, why isn't it standard with the FreeBSD distribution? Thanks, ==Leonard ==Leonard Sitongia sitongia@uswest.net http://www.users.uswest.net/~sitongia/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message