Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:07:44 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Elegant way to hack port source Message-ID: <2C40431FF3AE42C7B0234A97@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20100319220126.GH265@comcast.net> References: <a14066a01003190935t4bbef41esc44c60a5b00e6144@mail.gmail.com> <20100319170159.GB71392@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20100319200130.GE265@comcast.net> <3D386E86A152519AA850205C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <a14066a01003191404u56fd3f71mbfacff83839b7a2c@mail.gmail.com> <8B123BA51B43B4AAC86E0F3C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20100319220126.GH265@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On Friday, March 19, 2010 15:01:27 -0700 Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> wrote: > > Again, no need for the separate 'make extract' step. > In fact, I'd go straight to 'make build' or 'make install' here, and > skip the separate 'make patch' too. > Thanks, Charles. You taught me something today. :-) -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2C40431FF3AE42C7B0234A97>