From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Oct  7 18: 9: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 05B1637B502; Sat,  7 Oct 2000 18:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id KAA06803;
	Sun, 8 Oct 2000 10:08:45 +0900 (JST)
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, developers@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: wollman's message of Sat, 07 Oct 2000 21:04:32 -0400.
      <200010080104.VAA99968@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: header bogosity in <net/radix.h>
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 10:08:45 +0900
Message-ID: <6801.970967325@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>> 	i believe this was here so that we can share radix.[ch] among
>> 	sys/net, and sbin/routed.
>And, potentially, other routing processes.  However, last time I tried
>this, support had rotted sufficiently elsewhere as to require manual
>edits elsewhere, so I don't see much value in keeping the non-kernel
>alternative.  (I would not, however, delete the actual macros
>themselves -- just be more careful about the context in which they are
>defined.)
>Why should OpenSSL be including <net/radix.h> anyway?

	sorry i was unclear.  i was building sendmail with STARTTLS enabled
	(so it pulls in openssl).  sendmail tries to look at IP options,
	so it pulls in sys/netinet/ip_var.h.
	ip_var.h pulls in sys/net/route.h, and then sys/net/radix.h.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message