From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 16 18:58:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1332937B400 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:58:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2H2wiU6055787 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:58:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2H2wi0t055786 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:58:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:58:44 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Removing CSRG libm? Message-ID: <20020316185844.A55727@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A long time ago I submitted PR misc/17848 which removes CSRG libm sources. The audit trail shows some commentary, but AFAICT nothing much has been done based on that commentary. With the upcoming release of of 5.0, I think we should consider the removal od CSRG libm and the repo copying of msun to libm; otherwise we'll drag CSRG libm around until 6.0. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message