Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 17:14:25 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Parag Patel <parag@cgt.com> Cc: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: alpha kernel build failure (w/patch) Message-ID: <199907052314.RAA59341@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jul 1999 10:59:37 PDT." <64807.931197577@pinhead.parag.codegen.com> References: <64807.931197577@pinhead.parag.codegen.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <64807.931197577@pinhead.parag.codegen.com> Parag Patel writes: : Just curious, but is there a reason that these lines aren't simply : : sc->wb_btag = BUS_SPACE_IO; : : with this macro being set to the correct machine-specific one in some : appropriate header file? I'm sure I'm missing something... Yes. The bus tag should be obtained from new-bus's functions rather than it being hard coded. Also, the bus space on more complicated machines might be different than just I/O. In fact, even on Pccard machines one can make a good case for it being a different bus tag... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907052314.RAA59341>