Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:17:18 +0100
From:      Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What Happens When /proc is not Mounted in FreeBSD5.4?
Message-ID:  <20070201191718.721cfe32@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <200702011717.l11HHohf046488@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
References:  <200702011717.l11HHohf046488@dc.cis.okstate.edu>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
--Sig_7lwzv/dAEe38se0AGoRye.e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> wrote:

> 	I made a startling discovery when using strace to
> trouble-shoot a different problem on a freeBSD5.4 system that has
> been running since last October.  Both it and another new 5.4
> system had a /proc mount point but no process files.

If I remember correctly procfs is off by default
for security reasons.

> 	Would an unmounted /proc make the system run slower since
> proc files allow for examination of the operation of the running
> processes?

procfs is for user land applications, the kernel obviously
has other means to examine running processes.

I doubt that mounting procfs (without using it) has any measurable
effect on the system's performance, but if it does, I would assume
that it decreases performance rather than increasing it.

Fabian

--Sig_7lwzv/dAEe38se0AGoRye.e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFwi68BYqIVf93VJ0RAifHAJ9diLuFw8tw0EZl5M4AHwuRYMb4xgCeNF5f
5E4RqcjETL3iNMWjd8xLncQ=
=C8fa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_7lwzv/dAEe38se0AGoRye.e--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070201191718.721cfe32>