Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:14:20 +0200
From:      Jonas Liepuonius <thinker.lp@gmail.com>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Running hostapd with Atheros 11n
Message-ID:  <52C2D13C.1020104@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52C29D2B.6050409@entel.upc.edu>
References:  <52C1D9E0.9020805@entel.upc.edu> <CAJ-VmonRsoWAfo2XvB4EzsYGjJkz%2B1=c3WZc1LGd78n4SpYK9Q@mail.gmail.com> <52C29D2B.6050409@entel.upc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  You are definetaly in 11n mode, because it reports 11ng and this part 
"11g ht/20" means that it is listening on 11n channel. But I can't help 
you about the speed, which is indeed weird. I think Adrian is better 
suited to answer that question.

On 2013.12.31 12:32, Gustau Pérez wrote:
> On 30/12/2013 22:27, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please try 6:ht/20. It may be having issues with interference..
>>
>     Hi,
>
>     tried with 6:ht/20 but performance is horrible. The machine running
> hostapd reports this http://pastebin.com/aQD8Y2WD (still says 11g,
> wouldn't it report 11n?). In the client I see this:
> http://pastebin.com/hiDtZbRV
>
>     Running iperf between them reports about 6Mbit/s (which is quite low).
>
>     Am I missing something?
>
>     Greets,
>
>     Gustau
>
>
>> -a
>>
>>
>> On 30 December 2013 12:38, Gustau Pérez <gperez@entel.upc.edu> wrote:
>>>    Hi,
>>>
>>>    I've tried to run hostapd with an Atheros 5416 with 11n support (added
>>> ATH_ENABLE_11N to my kernel config). I configured the AP with 6:ht/40 (I
>>> guess the band width doesn't matter).
>>>
>>>    All the 11n enabled clients (two nexus4 and an ipad3) I have but my
>>> laptop are able to associate with the hostapd in 11n mode. The laptop
>>> has an Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205.
>>>
>>>    The AP runs HEAD/r257872 (Nov 8) and the client runs HEAD/r258760 (Nov
>>> 30), but updating the AP did not solve anything.
>>>
>>>    Will updating to current head in the client solve the issue? The only
>>> solution I've been able to use so far is forcing g mode in the AP. Doing
>>> that allows the 6205 client to associate with the AP.
>>>
>>>     Greets,
>>>
>>>     Gustau
>>>
>>> --
>>>     Salut i força,
>>>
>>>     Gustau
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Prou top-posting :      http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
>>> Stop top-posting :      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>>>
>>> O O O Gustau Pérez i Querol
>>> O O O Unitat de Gestió dels departaments
>>> O O O Matemàtica Aplicada IV i Enginyeria Telemàtica
>>>
>>>        Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
>>>        Edifici C3 - Despatx S101-B
>>>   UPC  Campus Nord UPC
>>>        C/ Jordi Girona, 1-3
>>>        08034 - Barcelona
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52C2D13C.1020104>