From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 23 14:22:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB269B1; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586E4694; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id xb12so2984687pbc.28 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:22:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X4NYsXJa5R0UAOOoB7ndJJIGQYK8CDyrr1bOmAwAk9I=; b=lD9o8B0ROaMs9a8RGG/3MAgTj11abA/aVfdvh23hkeZvLvDoOOg/XZCwrLpS5w+98c kxz8OHJSQ/CEqCX11dLKwBpkdyaCrrEnz2UXX/y7LHDE8zrY8J4YYm1rVawuuCvivTMt 6fLR7ZEgu6NUmFgjsbc90UtMadrbEHZ+t7dw0XXrSzBkSvk8AzlHBVS7zCqjZvtFPl+e 5rsTsH6/8kGSZQldatD+HEOZlHs8qA+7Mu6p3xoD1d/kYU+RY495ixVa2H7GAcPMvgkR u8JWC5fErEM0eCxkvrHahe2mAaIj5MQvlHv55PZzX92y5XiicUJGnHyiw1rqxMH61RAu i82w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.130.167 with SMTP id of7mr13410636pbb.169.1369318620115; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.31.195 with HTTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:17:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130523054541.GH96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130523054541.GH96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:17:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: do not show up the dialog(1) by default? From: Adam Vande More To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:54 -0000 On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > hi, > > A lot of people seems to be complaining about the configuration dialog popping > up all the time. > > What if we change the default behaviour to not pop up the dialog each time there > is a changed option but only when the user explicitly type make config? > > Just a proposal, please give your opinion. > > Of course make config-recursive behaviour won't change. > > regards, > Bapt I would rather the current behavior remained or even better would be if there was a native way to queue up all the config screen like portupgrade does(at least it did when I last used it, it's been awhile). It's not nearly as painful to answer them in bulk even if queue generation takes awhile. -- Adam Vande More