From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 16:30:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1745106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754118FC16 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA3GUD73007999 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA3GUDgn007996; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:30:13 GMT Message-Id: <201011031630.oA3GUDgn007996@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kostik Belousov Cc: Subject: Re: misc/151861: dlclose() of library causes separately opened libraries to unload as well X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kostik Belousov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:30:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/151861; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kostik Belousov To: Jaakko Heinonen Cc: Arjan van Leeuwen , bug-followup@freebsd.org, kan@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/151861: dlclose() of library causes separately opened libraries to unload as well Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:20:30 +0200 --dPNPvpIcGJA2vEEo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:12:05PM +0200, Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > On 2010-11-03, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > If you are going to take this approach, why not remove init_dag() alt= ogether > > > and make ref_dag() to initialize the dag when necessary? > > I like the explicit notion that ref_dag() does not initialize the DAG. > > We may add some assertion about state of the DAG there. >=20 > OK. I don't like that init_dag() is used to increase reference count for > already initialized DAGs but feel free to do whatever you think is > best. I do not like it too, but this is the current interface of init_dag(). Intermediate version of the latest patch removed the ref_dag() part from init_dag(). Would you prefer this ? --dPNPvpIcGJA2vEEo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkzRi84ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hTZQCg4gA9uxOWYQ1Znwk2dqIWXHXf UIwAn1fpTWW+N0nz7mawenn4o400FXCw =Hi4N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dPNPvpIcGJA2vEEo--