Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:01:21 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2 dies in zfs Message-ID: <20091123090121.GA59823@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <75706651-E9D4-4C40-B39C-6B8B0023DFF7@sarenet.es> References: <m2skcajavv.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2r5ruja6v.wl%randy@psg.com> <4B066B13.1070006@freebsd.org> <m2bpiwitz7.wl%randy@psg.com> <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBA5722E@w2003s01.double-l.local> <m2ws1jh2oy.wl%randy@psg.com> <75706651-E9D4-4C40-B39C-6B8B0023DFF7@sarenet.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:41:43AM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote: > On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > > >> Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on > >> FreeBSD is 13 > > > > that is what i am running. RELENG_7 > > I've been following ZFS on FreeBSD long ago, and it really seems to be stable on 8.0/amd64. > Even Sun Microsystems say that ZFS is better used on a 64 bit system, they don't recommend it > on the 32 bit version of Solaris. > > That said, there's still an outstanding bug, I managed to deadlock it but the condition is easy to avoid. Please provide details of this deadlock (PR, kernel output, scenario details, etc.), and details of how to avoid it. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091123090121.GA59823>