Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:53:34 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads in the base system Message-ID: <20001206165334.D64011@spawn.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001206164314.13505A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>; from eischen@vigrid.com on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:50:29PM -0500 References: <200012062138.eB6Lc6t07375@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001206164314.13505A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:50:29PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I was just [re]thinking about this. When we get libpthread (work > has just started on this), then libc_r will eventually go away. > It's not clear yet whether libpthread will exist as a separate > entity or whether it will evolve from libc_r. For the ignorant (me), what is/will be the difference between libc_r and libpthread? Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001206165334.D64011>