From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 11 12:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FCB16A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx6.internett.de (mx6.internett.de [82.192.193.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A37943D60 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@nettmail.de) Received: from p5083638b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.131.99.139]:1506 helo=nettmail.de) by mx6.internett.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.30) id 1BYlYn-0002DK-5S; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:55:05 +0200 Message-ID: <40C9ABA6.1020306@nettmail.de> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:55:02 +0200 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Douhan References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-internett-nett-scan-Information: Please contact nett-scan@internett.de for more information X-internett-nett-scan: Found to be clean X-internett-nett-scan-SpamCheck: cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org cc: ROBERTO SIANO Subject: Re: SV: ***SPAM*** HA cluster X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:55:29 -0000 Hi, if turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw seems down try: http://www.freebsd.org.hk/html/sgcluster/ cul michael Hi, look at sgcluster, i think this is the right thing for you: http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/ cul michael Matt Douhan wrote: >-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >Fran: owner-freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org >Hi there >can you suggest a good HA solution based on freeBSD servers, like the >following. >Load balancing TCP+UDP on virtual ip + failover on the routers. > > > ( net ) > > | > | > | > ---------- > | switch | > ---------- > / \ > / \ > ---------- ---------- failover > | active backup > router | | router | > ---------- ---------- > load-balance \ / > \ VIP / > ---------- > | switch | > ---------- > / \ > / \ > ---------- ---------- > | server1 | | server2 | > ---------- ---------- > real servers > > > >This solution make no real sense, why have HA servers when you do not have >HA switches?, you are likely to set yourself up for disappointment is all, >use seperate switches as well in order to get a real HA solution. > >Also in order to give more accurate answer we would need to know what >applications/services you will be providing, there is a huge difference >between all TCP and only wanting HTTP/HTTPS failover and so on. > >regards > >Matt > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >