Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:44:32 +0800 From: Robert Storey <y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recomendation for a lightweigth window manager Message-ID: <20030521094432.421895e9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> In-Reply-To: <20030521000042.GA99892@moo.holy.cow> References: <20030520223010.GA5974@teddy.fas.com> <20030521000042.GA99892@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 May 2003 20:00:42 -0400 parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net> wrote: > FVWM is considered light; so are wm2, wmx, ion > (black|open|hacked|flux)box. There are many others too. > > In FVWM on can certainly do what you want. Since you would have > control on the configuration files, other wms could be controlled to > various degress i suppose. FVWM is really good, and that's what I use. However, the default configuration is really ugly. If you care about aesthetics, I'd suggest going to the FVWM web site (fvwm.org) and download the "themes" tarball. I installed it, and it's great. regards, Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030521094432.421895e9.y2kbug>