Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:23:14 +0000
From:      Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?
Message-ID:  <3F7DB082.2030403@liwing.de>
In-Reply-To: <3F7DADAD.207@potentialtech.com>
References:  <200310022051.h92Kp6N1039873@gw.catspoiler.org> <3F7DA56D.8070002@liwing.de> <3F7DADAD.207@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran wrote:

[...]

> To me, this means:
> a) if you want reliable, don't use IDE with WC

Reducable of 'don't use IDE' :-)

> b) if you want reliable and fast, don't use IDE, period, use SCSI.

If you look at the recent postings, SCSI didn't help
you out everytime. I use the fileserver in current
configuration for nearly 5 years, and only once this
happend, each other case all filesystems including
hold data was recoverable.

Jens



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F7DB082.2030403>