From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 13 19:30:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1590816A41C for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:30:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC80143D46 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.157.226]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6DJUFPF033982; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:30:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <42D56B9E.9010701@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:29:34 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050709 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Teslik References: <20050713180114.M39694@acatysmoof.com> In-Reply-To: <20050713180114.M39694@acatysmoof.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: List freebsd-questions Subject: Re: mountmsdosfs(): disk too big still a problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:30:45 -0000 Alex Teslik wrote: >I have run into the "mountmsdosfs(); disk too big" problem while trying to >mount a 250GB FAT32 drive. This problem is pretty well documented: > >http://www.atm.tut.fi/list-archive/freebsd-stable/msg11027.html > >but I couldn't find any documentation regarding it being fixed when I googled >around. >I am running FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p5 i386. Does anyone know if this problem is >fixed in 4.11 or 5.4? > >Thanks, >Alex > > I'm thinking the answer is "no", but I've not searched the CVS tree. Last time I tried was about a month, maybe two months ago on 5.3, IIRC. FWIW, the limit is about 120GB, and, AFAIK, the problem is known (of course) and quite possibly is being addressed. Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P.