Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:51:02 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby port downgrade Message-ID: <20055.34982.971729.989196@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <0BC4EAF0-178E-4722-AFE4-3DA5C15D9989@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110825064354.029bc16a@seibercom.net> <4E562E66.3030001@FreeBSD.org> <20110825073341.3c302109@seibercom.net> <CADLo83-iBY07jqHdJOi6=y-Xts15CvbKg7C5kTJ07e7mzy6gWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110825080147.29ad7a71@seibercom.net> <0BC4EAF0-178E-4722-AFE4-3DA5C15D9989@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stanislav Sedov writes: > Meanwhile, we continue to work on fixing the major issued people > reported (some portupgrade glitches, ability to use the newer > ruby-gems under ruby 1.9), and hopefully we'll be able to make it > default again soon enough. Is there an estimate - even a rough one - when that will be? Respectfully, Robert Huff (who would like people to stop and think about how rarely this hapopens) \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20055.34982.971729.989196>