Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:36:17 +0100 (CET) From: Nick Hibma <nick@van-laarhoven.org> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing List <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Slight interface change on the watchdog fido Message-ID: <20061210223217.M1174@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061210152755.GA45265@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20061210110419.H42195@localhost> <20061210152755.GA45265@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I recognise this as the previous watchdog function API with > the extension that when told to disarm via a timeout value > of 0 the watchdog may now report failure to do so by setting > *error, correct? True, see the changes on the manpage. > If so this is fine with the stock mk48txx.c. Yes, that was the one watchdog that followed the sample in the Elan specific code correctly. At first I didn't have the interface change in and that meant changing mk48txx.c and I missed that afterwards I changed everything back to what is was in that driver. > Regarding your changes to watchdog.4 and watchdog.9 AFAICT > they violate the established style guidelines for FreeBSD > man pages; the source should wrap the line on sentence breaks. Is there a manual for man page writing? I've not done much of that yet. Nick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061210223217.M1174>