From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 11 16:20:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7723FD11 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from systemdatarecorder.org (ec2-54-246-96-61.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com [54.246.96.61]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "localhost", Issuer "localhost" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD99290B for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nereid (84-253-211-213.bb.dnainternet.fi [84.253.211.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by systemdatarecorder.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2.1) with ESMTP id s5BGJIwr016589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:19:19 GMT Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:20:14 +0300 From: Stefan Parvu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD rc service management future Message-Id: <20140611192014.6758ab6daf33ce21811c365c@systemdatarecorder.org> Organization: systemdatarecorder.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:30 -0000 Hi, Today I was reading about RHEL 7 and systemd. A mess. I believe it is complex, hard to manage and understand and you have no control when things go wrong. Anyway I was thinking to ask if FreeBSD has any plans to move away from rc(8) service management in near future ? I read a bit about porting launchd from Apple to FreeBSD (? why that it is designed for desktop and handling laptops, desktops) . rc works, it is simple, easy to configure and reliable. I would not want more from my machines for this part. Thanks, -- Stefan Parvu