Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:41:40 -0700 From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad@shire.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <BD1E0D37-7EF2-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050213152331.2B00E16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> <F64CC038-7EEE-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Vonleigh Simmons writes: > >> If you need to run explorer to access a website, someone should be >> fired. Standards compliance is a good thing. > > MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost > any other browser. Firefox does pretty well, tough; Opera much less > so. That is laughable. MS IE on Windows has one of the worst reputations around for following web standards. Go ask any professional designer. For a long time, IE on the Mac was one of the best, but it too fell behind and is no a discontinued product. Chad > > Webmasters should probably be replaced if they design an open Web site > for any _specific_ browser. Internal web sites are a different story. > > -- > Anthony > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BD1E0D37-7EF2-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC>