Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 20:15:20 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Larry Lile <lile@stdio.com> Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Current status of the olicom fracas. Message-ID: <17431.919624520@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Feb 1999 13:47:07 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902211336080.9637-100000@heathers.stdio.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902211336080.9637-100000@heathers.stdio.com>, Larry >So are my suggestions for making my driver and Olicom's objects more >palatble to the source tree not acceptable? What are the points of >contention? I would like to know so that I can see what else I could >do to fix this. They are not acceptable to me. An object file just simply doesn't count as "source" in my book. >I do think it is important to make the distinction between my driver >"if_oltr.c" and Olicom's "trlld.o". There is nothing about my driver, or >Olicom's header file "trlld.h", that violate the spirit of the source >tree. I think that the driver and header are fine where they live in >dev/oltr as it is a combined ISA/PCI driver. Sure, it's only that one file I have a problem with, and only because we do not have the source. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17431.919624520>