From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 21:11:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C243316A41B for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA3E13C48E for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l98LBGwO090958; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:11:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l98LBGRa042719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:11:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200710082111.l98LBGRa042719@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:11:47 -0400 To: "Jack Vogel" From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0710081336n11a36303ta70efc94c6f2d236@mail.gmail.co m> References: <2a41acea0710051328hdc0e49fr829b5ea35c95a413@mail.gmail.com> <200710082009.l98K9mCs042466@lava.sentex.ca> <2a41acea0710081336n11a36303ta70efc94c6f2d236@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: Heads UP - MFC for em coming shortly X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:11:17 -0000 At 04:36 PM 10/8/2007, Jack Vogel wrote: >So the missed packets are only showing up on em2? Hi, Yes, but thats where all the packets come in. >Uh, and that is a management-capable 82573, one that is often a >problem without the eeprom patched, did you do that sometime in >the past, I don't remember who did and who didnt :) No, I havent. Where do I find this program and how can I find out if I need it or not. The box in question is about 100miles away and it would be handy to confirm its needed remotely ---Mik