From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 23 00:04:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDBEA9B for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173671E98 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id m6so5355928wiv.13 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:04:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pfjk3LJGPWCChFHxyqbwOfZVF7s8OtBbMhkw5gZQXK4=; b=a5AleiSAuQqRMot13jRNO5hTxJ7bdiewreSChrrLkgetW8F+nqDe34HTTLYqMAK2Zp wRcPrQ1A1mo4cyhEHXKW+zLyJ0w37crQ3KZjcrO1bvwfcqlqq7V6wAZ4pWHfD1h6ur11 hJs69UNNuAZctRkh2QpimXX1SxA6NTeiM/Z4Yik+ZHoPFJvggknWNWFs8yJ5rAqZyZra BydnypWEvuzHKZbVk5HGYKqGPBToMz7+lyAMu/3AqTaPfEwTHoxQJMh7nW0fQJU2tC3x rUkzxaCQOVbsW6q2zuq8QkPsymv0Hm6zdVlI26CnviN4zFgruqIFE9/WpDAAy/hXbk9r vObw== X-Received: by 10.194.158.42 with SMTP id wr10mr57043792wjb.23.1366675450182; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q20sm12396070wiv.7.2013.04.22.17.04.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:04:07 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Home WiFi Router with pfSense or m0n0wall? Message-ID: <20130423010407.25a73c92@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:04:11 -0000 On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400 Michael Powell wrote: > Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think > it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just > takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before. Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you simply referring to weak keys?