Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:35:00 +0200 From: InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter <juergen.gotteswinter@internetx.com> To: Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS + NFS + CARP Message-ID: <7743eb1b-b07e-d5f2-bf28-8004fb06f3c6@internetx.com> In-Reply-To: <5f003083-e627-82c4-81fb-daa9c3cd71bf@internetx.com> References: <20160630144546.GB99997@mordor.lan> <71b8da1e-acb2-9d4e-5d11-20695aa5274a@internetx.com> <20160630153026.GA5695@mordor.lan> <5f003083-e627-82c4-81fb-daa9c3cd71bf@internetx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 30.06.2016 um 17:33 schrieb InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter: > >>> imho: >>> >>> leave hast where it is, go for zfs replication. will save your butt, >>> sooner or later if you avoid this fragile combination >> >> Do you mean a $> zfs snapshot followed by a $> zfs send ... | ssh zfs >> receive ... ? >> > > exactly, super simple, super robust, just works without hassle > check zrep, its a solid script for repliocation and failover (keeps the replication partner read only, and manages the switch to rw
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7743eb1b-b07e-d5f2-bf28-8004fb06f3c6>