Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Another question about pkgng
Message-ID:  <50B1422A.7070902@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <k8ralj$gu9$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <k8ralj$gu9$1@ger.gmane.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote=20
> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remot=
e=20
> repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite.
>=20
> That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first?=20

That would be consistent with the way 'pkg upgrade' and 'pkg install'
behave, so personally I think that would be a yes.

Can you open an issue on Github so this point does not get forgotten plea=
se?

https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.

PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk


--------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCxQioACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzCNQCeP+qhYtiVkAGLQZOGXENSloTL
es8AnAmJQBKSy6fTcXBdYsuZxmdKCVC+
=dBAY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B1422A.7070902>