From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 21:54:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE91F12 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D458FC08 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAOLsoCD013200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qAOLsoCD013200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1353794090; bh=3C58HGI7JjKWkNXQAfZ9GX3Fh7gM3VAhZO6Dh/gsPvI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Sat,=2024=20Nov=202012=2021:54:50=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Another=20question=20about=20pkgn g|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20; b=X7q7Euko58gx0u0zfDJdYn7EbMvxvfk9mN22zlz+5NSFT3QPKBhPxNRXy/PxU4DKf zkVKYED3bqxN0Os8ri41fdF+P+ivp9OfdkBFnHaBKW0cSlUPoOOvPoCBqivP2m80Ho gFMSxfsWJxekTyOm0Si+/7aNv/qybrHAeXjSjAwo= Message-ID: <50B1422A.7070902@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: > When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote=20 > repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remot= e=20 > repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. >=20 > That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first?=20 That would be consistent with the way 'pkg upgrade' and 'pkg install' behave, so personally I think that would be a yes. Can you open an issue on Github so this point does not get forgotten plea= se? https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCxQioACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzCNQCeP+qhYtiVkAGLQZOGXENSloTL es8AnAmJQBKSy6fTcXBdYsuZxmdKCVC+ =dBAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB43175E6C50E08DAE757C327--