From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 20 14:20:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889508B7 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.digiware.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:4cb8:90:ffff::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4392D1642 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46C31534D1; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:20:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from smtp.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MN1UqqRlNMDP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.101.102] (vpn.ecoracks.nl [31.223.170.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E48AB153448; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:20:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53060F37.7030203@digiware.nl> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:20:39 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland , fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What types of SSDs to use..... References: <5305F8B0.1060308@digiware.nl> <783388CA2911497B98479F1187F49915@multiplay.co.uk> <53060C89.8040500@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:20:39 -0000 On 20-2-2014 15:15, Steven Hartland wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Willem Jan Withagen" > > >> On 20-2-2014 14:06, Steven Hartland wrote: >>> The "disconnect" issue is generally related to Sandforce based devices. >>> >>> Its a lot better on later devices / firmware and does depend on the >>> controller / MB they are connected to. >> >> Any easy way to detect these? Or is it just a matter of reading the >> specsheets? Hoping that the controller chipset is mentioned. > > Its worse that that, its literally a try it an see. Seeing is: The devices just drops of the Sata-channel?? That is what happens with me with certain older Corsair stuff. --WjW