Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 22:30:42 +0300 (MSK) From: "."@babolo.ru To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: "."@babolo.ru, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/46854: ports/lang/ruby/files/patch-defines.h includes RCS ids Message-ID: <1043609442.402187.16834.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> In-Reply-To: <86znpo42xl.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:42:20 +0300 (MSK), > "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > Using ports tree as is without changes is not > > the only model of use. > > Propagation tweaked tree via cvs > > can screw RCS Ids. > > That is the misconfiguration. You are supposed to use the FreeBSD > version of CVS (or a compatible one) with a correct CVSROOT, or just > CVSup. Otherwise $FreeBSD$ tags are not properly expanded and other > problems could occur, like, well, patch conflicts. > > > Yes you are free to not clean up diffs > > from unnecessary chunks if want. > > You know, it is not good manners to modify a diff by hand. Suppose if > the RCS tag line were part of a big chunk. I could of course apply > the diff partly and then regenerate a patch, but note that that kinds > of irrelevant tasks can be too much to ask of a maintainer. Yes you are right. I filled PR ports/45200 to do it better but I am afraid that this functionality will be rejected. It is rejected now :-( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1043609442.402187.16834.nullmailer>