From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 27 12:04:51 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507D01065672;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A48FC16;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3573208C;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:04:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: -0.3/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42D62085;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:04:42 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org>
References: <868x19i6ky.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<759236930802251702h694c4f5bn2c7c87c7c47c7cc@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080226122512.GA30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86ve4bsx8l.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080226140456.GB30778@heechee.tobez.org> <867igrst0g.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080226144203.GC30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86mypnrary.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080226161635.GE30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86ejayr969.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080227104057.GA26979@heechee.tobez.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:04:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20080227104057.GA26979@heechee.tobez.org> (Anton Berezin's
	message of "Wed\, 27 Feb 2008 11\:40\:57 +0100")
Message-ID: <86oda2pput.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, lth@freebsd.org,
	Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@leeym.com>
Subject: Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-*
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:04:51 -0000

Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> writes:
> We are arguing about a relatively minor thing here, namely about whether =
to
> keep the knowledge about dual-life modules in bsd.perl.mk or try to deduce
> it in runtime (and by proxy, whether to use the existing *package* version
> check or to do perl *module* version check), not about the usefulness of =
the
> suggested knobs, remember?

OK, we can hash out the details at the Hackathon.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no